Is it possible to fill the rapid with 92 gasoline? What affects fuel consumption
Low octane or high octane?
Personally, I have never had such a question. And not at all because in the old days there was no choice. Then people only argued about how best to switch from 93rd to 76th, which some good people sold to other good people at half the price, or even cheaper. Unfortunately, when you can fill the tank for a third or even a quarter of the state price, then all technical arguments cowardly go aside.
There were many solutions. Some then installed an additional gasket in the cylinder head, others changed the spring stiffness of the distributor, others simply switched to late ignition, and the laziest did not change anything at all. But no one had any doubts that the Zhiguli still drives much better on its native 93-octane gasoline than on low-octane swill. However, what won’t you do to save significant money?
It is curious that today there are a lot of different gasolines, but the debate has not stopped at all. The difference in the declared octane numbers between 92 and 92 is not so big, but the topic does not die. There are two reasons for praising lower octane: the same desire to save money, as well as the fear of running into the shoddy quality of high-octane fuel. The latter circumstance was once generated by rumors that the 95th was supposedly being “bodied” more, but the 92nd was being done “correctly”. Well, the first one, regarding cost, is still alive today - they say, we are not so rich... and so on.
Generally speaking, in Europe there is no longer a 92nd. But we are not Europe. And any search site still explodes with hundreds of publications in response to numbers 92 or 95. Well, I’ll express my personal opinion for the hundredth time. And I apologize to those who don't like it.
About . I specifically present two photos from the gas station - one modern, the other six years ago. The prices for a liter of 92nd and 95th were, respectively, 33–70 and 36–70, and previously - 24–70 and 26–70.
The absolute difference in the price of a liter was 2 rubles, now it is 3 (however, somewhere a little higher). And how much can you save on refueling with such a delta? One hundred rubles? Given the current cost of the tank, this seems like a minor cause for concern to me. And I sincerely advise those who are going to prove that even a hundred rubles is money. I promise you a much more significant financial gain - I have written about this more than once. The same car can “eat” 7 liters per hundred, and all 15.
Now for the technique. Any engine is calibrated for a certain type of gasoline - this is a fact. And if the manufacturer wrote: they say, fill in only 95th, and - not a step to the side, then you need to listen to him. Even if you keep a three-finger combination in your pocket. The car will drive worse on low-octane gasoline (how could it be otherwise?), but that’s not the point. Imagine a bad case: there is a problem with the engine, and you come for service. And there, the funny guys will first take a fuel sample from the tank. And if at least something “from the wrong opera” is discovered, then you can forget about any of them. You need it?
Of course, this is an extreme case. Most modern engines designed for 95-grade gasoline will swallow 92-grade gasoline without any problems. But I still urge you to fill only with the gasoline that is indicated in the instructions for your car. If the spread is indicated, that’s a different matter: choose for yourself. But if it is not there, then do not conduct laboratory work on your own machine. Have pity on her. And myself at the same time.
By the way, all automakers have recently gone a little crazy, unanimously starting a campaign for 98-octane gasoline. They say, do not fill with low-octane 95, no matter what the instructions say. Only 98th in all cars without exception! I have already spoken out about this, more than once, but the trend is clear: you give high octane! Therefore, I repeat once again: when choosing between 92 and 95, I am always in favor of 95.
However, there are funny things in the Fatherland. An interesting observation was recently made by my former colleague Vadim Kryuchkov. He was interested in the question of what kind of fuel should be poured into VAZ cars - that’s where it came from. It turned out that VAZ and Renault-Nissan do not have a unified approach: the same engine installed on different models is prescribed different types of fuel.
I quote Vadim. “For Vesta and XRAY with a VAZ-21129 engine, A-92 is allowed, and for similar engines on Priora, Kalina and Grant under the VAZ-21127 symbol, only A-95 is prescribed. Or, let’s say, the eight-valve VAZ-11189 for Largus officially swallows the 92nd, but give the same Kalina VAZ-11186 engine only the 95th.” And here’s another: “Why does the 16-valve K4M engine developed by the alliance under the hood of the Lada Largus require an A-95, but in Almere, Logan and Sandero it can work on an A-91? Moreover, Renault even allows short-term operation on gasoline with an octane rating of 87 according to the research method. There is no such grade in Russia, but low-quality 92 may get into the tank, which the engine will somehow cope with.”
In short, the engineers did not agree with each other which saint they should collectively believe in. Previously, at the same VAZ, a certain unity of views reigned: they say, 95 - that’s all. The arguments are simple: at the same time, we promise you environmental friendliness plus efficiency plus acceleration, etc. There was also a backup argument: this is the so-called technological reserve laid down by the designer for all sorts of “ifs”! In other words, if somewhere, “not in our area,” as Comrade Saakhov said, they still fill you with something worse than 95, then nothing will happen to your engine. But as soon as we resolve the 92nd, we will thereby take responsibility for some 87th... And who needs this?
Today, it seems to me, it makes no sense to develop engines for the 92nd. If only because, as I already said, in Europe such numbers are no longer in use. The lower modern limit is 95. As for modern and previously released cars, I will repeat once again: I am for the 95th.
Even if the automaker allows for variations in octane.
Which gasoline is better - 92 or 95?
Is it true that 92nd gasoline is better than 95th? Or is it worse? Which one should ultimately be poured into the tank? And why do VAZ and Renault-Nissan recommend different types of fuel for the same engines?
Which gasoline is better - 92 or 95?Content
In the Skoda model range, the five-door liftback Škoda Rapid occupies an intermediate position between the flagship Octavia model and the smaller Fabia. The final version of the model was shown in the second half of 2012 in Paris, after which it went into production.
The car is offered with various options of naturally aspirated and turbocharged engines. Aspirated engines include 1.2 petrol engines (75 hp) and two 1.6 liter options with 105 or 110 hp. Of the turbocharged engines, two types of gasoline 1.2-liter engines with a power of 90 and 110 hp, a 1.4-liter engine with 122 hp, as well as two 1.6-liter turbodiesels with 90 and 105 hp are available.
Skoda Rapid mechanics
All Škoda Rapid models are available with a manual transmission. A five-speed transmission is available for naturally aspirated engines, and turbocharged units are equipped with a six-speed manual. The exception is the 105 hp turbodiesel, available only with a 5-speed manual transmission, and the premium 1.4 liter turbo engine, for which only an automatic is offered.
Reviews of fuel consumption per 100 km Skoda Rapid manual
- Anatoly, Khabarovsk. I had been looking at the Skoda showroom for a long time, but finances did not allow me to take an Octavia in good configuration. Therefore, I chose the basic configuration of the Skoda Rapid 1.2MT, 2014. Everyone is happy with the car, except that the engine is of course rather weak. But there is a plus here - in the city my consumption is about 7 liters, on the highway about 5.5 liters per hundred.
- Dmitry, Barnaul. An excellent car with an attractive and modern design. I'm happy with everything except one thing - low ground clearance. For our roads we need at least 15-20 mm more. But gasoline consumption justifies all the investments - on average 5 l/100 km, 1.2MT engine.
- Gregory, Stary Oskol. In 2013, I bought a diesel version of the Skoda Rapid with a “handle”. I expected more from the car, especially since the engine is offered in a turbo version. But it’s really not enough for such a heavy car - there is no dynamics, overtaking is difficult, and the sound insulation could be better. Consumption is really very low - about 4 liters outside the city, in the city with air conditioning - 5.5-6.0.
- Anatoly, Smolensk. I bought Rapid in 2014 – before that I had Priora. My impressions are a little disappointed. Yes, the engine is better than that of the VAZ - still a turbocharged 1.2 liter and 110 horses, but it pulls very poorly downhill. There are a lot of complaints about the assembly in general. Consumption in mixed mode is 6.5-7.0 liters - I think that’s a lot for such a small engine.
Skoda Rapid automatic
Skoda Rapid cars are equipped with two automatic transmission options. For the 1.4 liter turbocharged petrol engine, only a 7-speed DSG robot is offered, and for 1.6 liter engines a five-speed automatic transmission can be installed. On models with a 1.2 liter engine, the automatic transmission is not installed at all.
Fuel consumption rate for Skoda Rapid automatic - reviews
- Yuri Belgorod. We bought a car in 2014 – a diesel with an automatic transmission and were not disappointed at all. Comfortable and convenient, fairly large trunk. Very economical in daily use - consumption in the city is only 5.5 liters per 100 km.
- Georgy, Moscow. When I walked into the showroom, I immediately liked the car – its streamlined shape, interesting design. I chose version 1.6 AT and did not regret it. There is normal space in the cabin, and in the trunk too; in terms of dynamics, I personally am happy with everything. On the highway the engine consumes 7 liters, in the city – 9.5-10.
- Valery, Moscow. Skoda Rapid 1.6AT, 2013. The car was disappointing. Just a couple of months later, I had to replace a lot of small parts, since they were of disgusting quality as standard. I am also very dissatisfied with the service - it is simply disgusting at Skoda. The only plus is the low gasoline consumption, which does not exceed 10 liters in the city with Conder, and 7 liters on the highway. Well, the trunk is big.
- Konstantin, Kaliningrad. Skoda Rapid 2015, 1.4AT. When I was choosing a car, I only considered the most complete package, so I chose one with a turbo engine and a robot. The gearbox is good, quite economical and actually suits this engine, so the consumption is low - about 7.5 liters on the highway, 9-11 in the city, depending on driving style. But for the rest... I wanted to get something better for that kind of money.
- Kirill, Moscow. I read reviews that people complain about Skoda Rapid and I don’t understand the reason for the dissatisfaction. An excellent and reliable car, I have a 2012 Rapid, 1.6AT diesel - I haven’t had a single breakdown, I just change consumables. A very good car, and with a consumption in the city of 5.5 - 6 liters per hundred - it’s a song. Just right for the capital!
The Skoda Rapid is an economical car that can cover long distances on a single fill-up. Despite this, the car is quite dynamic, so there are no problems with driving in dense city traffic or on the highway.
For reliable and long-term operation of the power plant and related systems, the vehicle should be fueled only with recommended fuel. Otherwise, problems may appear even after the first visit to the gas station.
An increase in fuel consumption is usually a consequence of improper maintenance or failure of a component. An increase in gasoline consumption is an important signal that your car needs attention. Otherwise, excessive wear of parts is possible, which will subsequently result in a major overhaul.
Fuel consumption of Skoda Rapid with different engine sizes
The fuel consumption of the Skoda Rapid depends on the size of the power plant and the type of transmission the car has. Fuel consumption per 100 km is discussed in more detail in the table below.
Gasoline selection
The vehicle may only be filled with unleaded gasoline that complies with the EN 228 standard. It is recommended to use fuel with a research octane rating of 95. It is allowed to refuel the car with gasoline with an octane rating of 92 or 98. When refueling with fuel with an octane rating of 92, the car's dynamics may deteriorate, as well as a slight increase in fuel consumption.
Table - Effect of octane number on driving a Skoda Rapid
| Octane number | Description |
|---|---|
| AI-92 | Despite the manufacturer's stated reduction in the unit's power when using gasoline with an octane rating of 92, it is not possible to really detect the "loss of horses." A lack of power can only be observed when the car is fully loaded. |
| AI-95 | The best choice. There is no detonation, acceleration is dynamic. |
| AI-98 | The engine runs smoother, but only if the fuel is of high quality. Car owners note that among gasoline with an octane number of 98 there is a lot of counterfeit. Low-quality additives that increase engine ratings cause clogging of the injector nozzle and lead to the need to repair the engine and related systems. |
The manufacturer allows refueling in emergency situations with fuel with an octane number below 91. In this case, it is necessary to continue driving at low speeds, without picking up high speed. Increased crankshaft speed will cause severe detonation, which can damage the engine. At the first opportunity, you need to refuel with gasoline with an OC of 92-98, after draining the low-octane fuel from the gas tank.
Fuel tank volume
The volume of the fuel tank that is installed on the Skoda Rapid allows you to cover from 700 to 1100 km without refilling.
Table - Skoda Rapid gas tank volume
Despite the large volume of the gas tank, car owners do not recommend using up all the fuel. You should refuel when there is about 20% of the total gasoline left in the tank. This is due to the fact that there is a risk of contamination of the filter with foreign particles from the bottom of the gas tank.
Description of the reasons for high fuel consumption on the Skoda Rapid and their solution
A common reason for increased fuel consumption is a decrease in tire pressure below nominal. This results in increased rolling resistance. To eliminate problems with increased fuel consumption, it is necessary to pump up the wheels, after checking the pressure using a pressure gauge.
Trying to create a sporty look for a car, car owners install an aerodynamic body kit. Incorrect installation or purchasing low-quality stock parts leads to increased resistance to oncoming air flows. To eliminate problems with increased fuel consumption, in this case, it is necessary to dismantle the newly installed elements of the aerodynamic body kit.
Effect of maintenance on fuel consumption
Untimely maintenance or the use of low-quality consumables can cause an increase in gasoline consumption. The greatest influence on consumption is:
- air filter;
- spark plug;
- oil filter and oil.
If the air filter replacement interval is violated, it becomes clogged. This leads to disruption of the formation of the air-fuel mixture.
Worn-out spark plugs cause misfires in the fuel-air mixture. As a result, the power plant begins to burn out, and the unburned fuel is burned out in the converter, causing its rapid failure. Some of the fuel gets into the oil, diluting it. This causes accelerated wear of the power plant.
Negligence in changing engine oil and filter leads to insufficient lubrication of friction units. This causes increased loads in the power plant. As a result, fuel consumption increases and major repairs are approaching.
To solve problems arising due to improper maintenance, it is necessary to replace consumables with new ones recommended by the manufacturer. Subsequent maintenance must be carried out promptly.
In today's conditions, with the ever-increasing price of fuel, when choosing a car, more and more motorists are thinking about travel efficiency and fuel consumption. The new middle-class liftback from Skoda was presented to the public in 2012. The fuel consumption of the Skoda Rapid per 100 km was kept at significantly low figures.
Review of Skoda Rapid modifications
Models with gasoline or diesel engines were supplied to the European market. It is interesting that the average gasoline consumption of the Skoda Rapid stated in the technical documentation is actually the same as the real consumption of the Skoda Rapid 1.6:
| Engine | Consumption (highway) | Consumption (city) | Consumption (mixed cycle) |
| 1.2 MPI (petrol) 5-Mech | 4.6 l/100 km | 8 l/100 km | 5.8 l/100 km |
|
1.2 TSI (petrol) 5-Mech |
4.4 l/100 km | 6.5 l/100 km | 5.1 l/100 km |
|
1.2 TSI (petrol) 6-Mech |
4.6 l/100 km | 6.9 l/100 km | 5.4 l/100 km |
|
1.6 MPI (petrol) 5-Mech |
4.9 l/100 km | 8.9 l/100 km | 6.4 l/100 km |
|
1.6 MPI (petrol) 5-automatic |
6 l/100 km | 10.2 l/100 km | 7.5 l/100 km |
|
1.2 TSI (petrol) 6-Mech |
4.6 l/100 km | 6.9 l/100 km | 5.4 l/100 km |
|
1.6 MPI (petrol) 5-Mech 2WD |
4.7 l/100 km | 7.9 l/100 km | 5.9 l/100 km |
|
1.6 TDI (diesel) 5-Mech |
3.7 l/100 km | 5.6 l/100 km | 4.4 l/100 km |
Skoda Rapid 1.2 (manual transmission)
This is the basic configuration of the car model. The technical characteristics of the engine suggest power indicators equal to 75 horsepower. The car is equipped with a five-speed manual transmission. Fuel consumption for a Skoda Rapid of this type is 8 liters per 100 kilometers in urban areas and 4.7 liters when driving on the highway. The car is capable of reaching speeds of up to 180 km/h.
Skoda Rapid 1.6(mt\at)
The use of a 1.6-liter engine with a power value of 107 horsepower coupled with a 5-speed manual transmission slightly increased fuel consumption. The fuel consumption standards for the Skoda Rapid in the city were 8.9 liters, and the fuel consumption of the Skoda Rapid on the highway was 5 liters. The maximum speed of the car is 195 km/h.
When using an automatic transmission, according to owner reviews, The average gasoline consumption of the 2016 Skoda Rapid in the urban cycle increased to 10 liters per 100 kilometers, in the suburban cycle to 6 liters.
Diesel versions of popular cars demonstrate good efficiency indicators. The average fuel burned in the combined cycle can be calculated as 4.5 liters per 100 km.
What affects fuel consumption
Fuel consumption figures are influenced by many factors. This includes the type of engine, its volume, transmission modification, year of manufacture of the car and its technical condition. One of the determining factors is the seasonality of car operation.
Comparing the data for the warm and cold seasons, you can see that fuel costs in winter are slightly higher.
This is due to the need to warm up the engine for a long time, and the need for heating the interior also increases.
In general, we can say that the Skoda Rapid is a reliable middle-class car. There were no significant shortcomings in the car; the car performed well.